Different Types of Materials Used in Full Mouth Dental Implants

Materials Used in Full Mouth Dental Implants

With advancements in dental technology, full-mouth dental implants are becoming a reliable, long-term solution for people with missing teeth. This restorative procedure requires carefully selecting and using different materials to ensure comfort and durability. From implant posts to abutments and crowns, it’s essential to choose an experienced professional who understands the unique properties of these materials and how they work together as part of a total restoration package. This blog post explores all the materials used to create beautiful new smiles with full-mouth dental implants.

Definition of Full Mouth Dental Implants

Full-mouth dental implants are popular for patients with significant tooth loss or damage. Implants, which include restoration dentures, prosthetic teeth, and abutments, provide a more stable foundation to secure replacement teeth in the oral cavity comfortably and permanently. The dentist assesses and determines whether full-mouth dental implants can support existing prostheses such as bridges and dentures. In some cases, full-mouth dental implant treatments may be recommended as opposed to other traditional restoration procedures because, with good care, they last longer and offer greater stability, comfort, and an improved aesthetic look. Therefore, full-mouth dental implants are an effective way to replace all natural teeth in your upper and lower jaw through a precise treatment plan designed by your dentist.

Titanium

Description and Properties of Titanium

Titanium is an incredibly versatile and durable material perfect for full-mouth dental implants. This metal alloy, composed of iron, oxygen, and other elements, including vanadium, has various physical and chemical properties that can bond with a person’s bone tissue, making titanium-based implants a preferred choice for implantation surgeries. Titanium is biocompatible and robust yet lightweight, allowing titanium posts anchored in the jawbone to provide even greater stability than natural teeth while being virtually unnoticeable. In addition, they are corrosion resistant due to titanium’s unique protective layer known as its passive oxide film, which helps reduce plaque and bacteria buildup over time. The superior strength and malleability of titanium also allow dentists to shape the material around any required profile or into the desired final restorative shape, which helps maximize patient comfort. This malleability enables custom-fitting structures, promoting long-lasting implant success for years.

Advantages and Disadvantages Of Titanium for Full-Mouth Dental Implants

Titanium has been widely used for dental implants due to its biocompatibility, strength, and corrosion resistance. However, it also has some drawbacks to consider. Titanium does not have the elasticity that allows for movement, which means that it can limit natural movement within the jawbone. This immobility can cause the development of a fibrous joint capsule around the implant resulting in decreased function and discomfort over time. Additionally, titanium is highly reflective and can pose aesthetic issues with some restorations, such as porcelain or ceramic crowns or veneers. While titanium is durable enough for full-mouth dental implants, weighing all factors and discussing them with a dentist before treatment is essential.

Zirconia (Ceramic)

Description and Properties Of Zirconia (Ceramic)

Zirconia (Ceramic) is quickly gaining traction as a preferred material used for full-mouth dental implants. It offers excellent biocompatibility and highly favorable properties for specific medical applications. Zirconia is incredibly durable and boasts the highest strength-to-weight ratio of any traditional ceramic material, proving resistant to wear and tear, even with constant contact with oral tissue. It has high abrasion resistance and, unlike metals, does not rust as easily. Furthermore, it provides superior stability due to its strong bond with bone tissue. Dental implants made from Zirconia have been known to help improve patient quality of life while saving time and money spent on maintenance compared to other materials used in full mouth dental implants.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Zirconia (Ceramic) 

This material is highly aesthetic, lightweight, scratch and fracture-resistant, and biocompatible. Zirconia’s low thermal conductivity also makes it the perfect choice for people who experience heightened sensitivity to cold liquids or foods. Other benefits of zirconia dental implants include no need for secondary abutment, being placed in critical areas without significant bone loss, and being cost-effective. However, there are some disadvantages, such as potential pseudo-gingival recessions if the restoration margin is incorrect or kept untreated and long healing times, among others. 

Hybrid Abutment Design with Composite Cement

Description and Properties of Hybrid Abutment Design With Composite Cement

A hybrid abutment design with composite cement is a dental implant that secures full-mouth dentures. This design utilizes a combination of titanium screws and acrylic resin for the abutment, resulting in maximum durability that prevents the prosthetic from shifting or sliding within the patient’s mouth. The titanium screws also provide superior mechanical strength and wear resistance, extending the implant’s life and allowing for long-term satisfaction with its performance. Additionally, composite cement is used to bond the abutment, offering advanced adhesion capabilities compared to traditional methods and providing enhanced resistance to harsh elements such as force, shock, extreme temperature changes, and corrosive chemicals. This combination offers superior comfort and stability to other dental implants while maintaining an aesthetic appeal.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Hybrid Abutment Design with Composite Cement for Full-Mouth Dental Implants

One significant advantage of this design is that it is less likely to overheat or cause tissue damage as the heat generated during polymerization is distributed along the margins, unlike traditional abutment designs where the heat is concentrated in one area. Additionally, composite cement adheres more firmly to the abutment and increases fracture resistance than screws alone. On the other hand, a hybrid abutment design with composite cement for full-mouth dental implants may require more time for fabrication when compared with traditional implant designs. Moreover, since stress related to implant placement often depends on abutment height, the additional layer of material between the implant and prosthesis should be considered when planning treatment. Overall, clinicians need to weigh both advantages and disadvantages before selecting a particular type of design when placing full-mouth dental implants.

Conclusion

The different types of materials used in full-mouth dental implants have benefits and drawbacks that you must consider before deciding. It is essential to consult with a professional who can help you weigh all the factors involved and ensure you are making the best decision for your unique needs. At NJ Smile Clinic, our team of experienced implant dentists will work with you to help you choose the suitable material for your full-mouth dental implants to achieve the smile of your dreams. Contact us today to schedule a consultation!

Share: